The Questionable Birth Eligibility of Barack Obama, Alias Barry Soetoro: A Basic Matter of Law

Of all of the elected federal officers in Washington, DC, who might have a lot of explaining to do about their backgrounds and their constitutional eligibility to have been elected, and to be re-elected, there is only one who I know has two surnames and a second given name (one an alias), and a social security number from a state where he has never lived. That person is Barack H. Obama, alias Barry Soetoro. Of all the senators currently in the U.S. Senate, and of all the representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives, none of them have a bonifide alias, or another name by which they were known for a lengthy period of their lives. In U.S. Presidential history, since 1789, there was never an elected U.S. President who didn't have a mother and a father, both, born in the United States until Barack H. Obama was elected in 2008. This man had a father who was not born in the United States, who was a British citizen at the time of his birth. The U.S. Constitution, in its Article 2, stipulates that for a person to be eligible to be a U.S. President, that individual must be natural-born citizen, that is, a person born on American soil to two U.S. citizens.

Why Sen. Obama's birth issue was not investigated by the U.S. Senate at the same time Sen. John McCain's Panama Canal Zone birth was formally probed, in 2008, was something very irregular that didn't make much sense. McCain was more than glad to allow his long form birth certificate, educational records, and any other of his personal documents to be closely scrutinized by the U.S. Senate and by the American public. But when Obama's natural-born citizen status was questioned, and the Illinois Senator was asked to produce his long form Hawaiian birth certificate, he adamantly refused to make it a public record. The same applied to his educational or academic records.

Moreover, Obama, since 2008 has spent close to 2 million dollars of Democratic campaign funds and U.S. tax money in court costs and attorney's fees to fight the attempts of U.S. citizen plaintiffs, in federal lawsuits, to obtain an order from a U.S. District Court judge forcing him to disclose those records to the public. How did he spend thousands of U.S. tax dollars to defend himself in private lawsuits? After he was supposedly elected lawfully, Obama continuously used U.S. Department of Justice attorneys and their federal resources to produce petitions and arguments for him in those federal court hearings. That was, and is, illegal for him to do. No federal officer has a right to use federal resources in private lawsuits, not even a standing U.S. President. Nonetheless, when U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston dismissed a federal lawsuit brought against President George W. Bush, Karl Rove, Condileeza Rice, and others of the Bush II administration, by attorney Stanley R. Hilton in 2004 for over 160 9/11 victims' families, on a basis of sovereign immunity, a precedent was set that unjustly declared that a U.S. President could commit any crime, even murder, with apparent impunity. This, of course, was a very improper ruling that Illston produced, but no one in authority questioned it, and, incredibly, it still stands.

The conduct of Barack Obama and his supporters prior to April 2011 seemed to indicate total obstinacy to the public demand for disclosure of his Hawaiian long form birth certificate. Then some of the States began preparing legislation requiring presidential candidates to produce proof that they are natural born citizens prior to having their names placed on state ballots. That's when Obama's very questionable long form Hawaiian birth certificate suddenly appeared on the Internet.

The book by Dr. Jerome Corsi, "Where's the Birth Certificate?" presents immaculately valid arguments showing that this Internet document is, in all probability, a very flawed and fraudulent forgery. Based upon the evidence that Dr. Corsi presented in his remarkably researched book, Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio was persuaded in September 2011 to investigate Barack Obama's presidential birth eligibility with Maricopa County Cold Case Posse resources. Within the last month, Sheriff Arpaio has demanded the release of the original Hawaiian Health Department microfiche records of births for the month and year Obama has claimed he was born in Honolulu. Based on the irregularities found on the document released by Obama in April 2011, along with the facts that the President has a Connecticut Social Security number and that his father was a British citizen at the time of Barry's (Barack's?) birth, the microfiche records would be the only fool-proof way for Obama to prove that the flawed long form birth certificate is actually his legal birth record.

Yet, the poignant question that looms ahead, the one that Sheriff Arpaio is concernedly posing, is what the U.S. Congress, the Legislative branch of the federal government, will do with the information that conclusively shows in his investigation that Barack Obama is NOT a natural-born citizen of the United States. We already know that Barack (Barry?) only had one parent, his mother, who was an American citizen at the time of his birth. His father was British. But what if the Hawaiian microfiche records show that the birth document on the Internet is fraudulent, that Barack was not born on U.S. soil? Will Obama be properly impeached, that is, indicted for high crimes by the House of Representatives and tried by the Senate with the U.S. Supreme court Chief Justice presiding? Or will Congress casually ignore the facts and allow Obama to flout the supreme law of the land, just because he is, supposedly, the first African-American president, though elected fraudulently? It would seem that, if Obama is innocent of high crimes against the U.S. Constitution and the People and if he is truly a natural-born citizen, he would want to prove it and eliminate all doubt by allowing the microfiche to be disclosed.

Perhaps Obama will very soon have an opportunity in the court of Georgia Judge Michael Malihi to produce the evidence that he is truly a natural-born citizen, since Judge Malihi has refused to accept Obama's lawyer's demands that he be excused from responding to a subpoena to appear in court on Wednesday, January 26, 2012 to show that his is constitutionally eligible by birth to be a U.S President and to be re-elected. God bless a Georgia State judge for doing something that several federal judges should have done between 2008 and 2010. It will be interesting to see whether Barack Obama, alias Barry Soetoro, will demonstrate his willingness or unwillingness in the coming days to be in subjection to law and justice.